20th century Latin America

In chapter thirty-one many different aspects of 20th century Latin America are discussed. After the passing of the 19th century Latin America was not only able to continue to function without creating a new nationhood but also able to stay away from warfare and conflicts that would destroy the country. The only major war that occurred was from 1932-1935 was the Chaco war between Bolivia and Paraguay. One unfortunate aspect was that there was violence in the country against peasant protesters and Indian minorities as landowners who were being killed while the caudilos were trying to keep their power. A theme of Latin America was the revolution in the beginning of the 20th century. This revolution was mainly about the political structure and governmental reform. With the population growing this brought about economic problems that needed severe change for Latin America to survive in the 20th century. The last theme of the chapter is through out all these political and economical problems facing Latin America they were still able to grow as a culture. This growth was in areas of painting, architecture, and literature. The Mexican Revolution, from 1910-1917, was the great event of the early 20th century in Latin America, though it directly affected only the one major nation (Stearns p.614). The revolution dates back to 1900 when intellectuals started to look at how corrupt Porfirio Diaz was as a leader. This soon spread out to more people such as urban workers and the peasantry. Their main goal was to get the economic side of Mexico back in their rule and not outsider rule such as the United States investors. The peasant leader was Emiliano Zapata who believed in "Land and Liberty". Pancho Villa was the Bandit leader who robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. After Diaz escaped Francisco Madero tried to become the new leader but people felt that he was not looking out for the working-class and he soon lost the revo...

Your Blues Aint Like Mine essays

Your Blues Ain't Like Mine essays Mississippi Mud: A report on Your Blues Aint Like Mine I never thought that reading a book would open up my mind like this one did. This book exposed me to all the horrors of the south during the civil rights movement and beyond. It all starts one summer in the fifties in rural Mississippi. Armstrong Todd, a young black man, is sent away to his grandmas for awhile by his mother, Delotha, while she got back on her feet. See Delothas husband Wydell left because he was a drunk and Delotha couldnt deal with him anymore. So since Delotha couldnt make enough money in Chicago to feed herself and Armstrong she sent him down to live with her mother, Odessa, in Hopewell, Mississippi. This is where it all starts. One day after school Armstrong was milling around in the town pool hall for blacks, owned by Floyd Cox, a poor white man. He was showing off and having a good time and trying to convince all the other blacks in the hall how educated he was by speaking French to them. When Floyd and his wife Lily came into town that day, they stopped by t he pool hall to see if things were going ok. Floyd told Lily to stay in the truck when he went inside but she didnt listen to him and went in anyway. Once inside the young black man fascinated her talking French and she started to blush when he talked to her. Floyd didnt know what to think when he saw this happening and since he didnt understand French and didnt care too much for black people, he took the French as Armstrong saying dirty things to his wife. This infuriated him and he yelled at and almost came to beating up Armstrong. After this he thought he had taken care of everything, but his father Lester and John Earl thought different and convinced Floyd that he should kill the young black boy for talking nasty to his wife. So they did. This is only the beginning. The book also goes into detail about Floyds family ...

Financial analysis case study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Financial analysis case study - Essay Example At the same time there is a belief that chairman statement serves no purpose from the point of view of shareholders. It is a sort of ritual to inaugurate the reporting and review process in the annual report. There is no legal requirement for a chairman statement to be a part of an annual report. It is more of a customary part of the annual report. ‘The chairman report is largely qualitative in character. The other documents report what happens, this one offers an explanation of the company’s results. The accounts and other statutory reports present historic information on how the company fared in the previous accounting period, while the chairman will comment on future prospectus and plans.’ (Christopher Murphy, page 177)1 Directors Report is a central section of prime importance of an Annual report. It is prepared annually and in case of parent company directors’ report will be for the entire group called ‘group directors’ report. ‘Directors’ report deals with significant development in the company’s business operations during the reporting period. This is effectively a review of business and an opportunity for the board to comment on the financial results of the company in terms of its sales and profits, and to explain material matters such as exceptional items.’(Thomas A Lee, page 170)2 In accordance with the provisions of sections 415 to 419 of Chapter 5 of Part 15 of the Companies Act 2006, a directors’ report must contain the following information: i) trends and factors affecting company’s future development, performance and position of business, information about environmental matters, company’s employees and social and community issues, and information about important contractual and other business arrangements. ‘In addition to the above legal requirements, a directors’ report should also include information required by the stock exchange. As an option some companies include additional